Meeting Culture Is Broken. Here's What to Do About It.
Workers spend 11.3 hours per week in meetings. 5 of those hours are unproductive. That costs businesses $375 billion annually. Time to fix it.
Laddro Team

According to FlowTrace's 2025 State of Meetings report, the average employee now spends 11.3 hours per week in meetings. That's 392 hours per year, roughly 15% of total work time. For managers, it's 13 hours. For executives, nearly 23 hours per week.
And here's the part that should make every CEO wince: Fellow.ai's 2025 research found that time wasted in unproductive meetings has doubled since 2019 to 5 hours per week. Notta's meeting statistics compilation reports that 35% of all business meetings are considered a waste, costing businesses an estimated $375 billion annually.
If everyone agrees meetings are a problem, why does nothing change?
Why meetings multiply
Meetings are easy to create. Sending a calendar invite takes 30 seconds. It's the lowest effort way to feel productive.
Cover your bases culture. Not being invited to a meeting feels like being excluded. So people invite everyone "just in case." A three person discussion becomes a twelve person meeting where nine people sit silently.
Remote work amplified it. In the office, you could tap someone on the shoulder for a quick question. Remote work replaced shoulder taps with 30 minute calendar slots. Microsoft's 2025 research confirms this: meetings and chats peak around 11am, making it "the most overloaded hour of the day."
No one owns meeting culture. Each individual meeting seems reasonable. It's the aggregate that's crushing. According to Archie's 2025 meeting research, 68% of employees say they lack enough uninterrupted focus time because of constant meetings.
The math of meeting costs
A one hour meeting with eight people costs eight hours of collective productivity. If those eight people earn an average of €70,000, that meeting costs approximately €280 in salary alone. Weekly, that's €14,560 per year for one recurring meeting.
And that's only direct cost. Research consistently shows it takes approximately 23 minutes to regain deep focus after a meeting. So a one hour meeting actually costs nearly an hour and a half when you include context switching.
What to do about it (as an individual)
Audit your calendar. For each meeting, ask: Did it produce a decision? Did it require me specifically? Could the outcome have been achieved with a document or message?
Decline with purpose. "Thanks for the invite. I don't think I'll add much. Would you mind sending me the notes?" Most people accept this gracefully.
Propose alternatives. Status updates belong in a shared document. Brainstorming works better as an async document where people add ideas over 24 hours, then a short meeting to discuss the best ones.
Protect deep work time. Block 2 to 3 hours per day as focus time. 80% of workers say they'd be more productive with fewer meetings, according to research cited in FlowTrace's report. The research supports you.
What to do about it (as a manager)
Set a meeting budget. Cap meetings at X hours per week. Make it explicit.
Require an agenda for every meeting. No agenda, no meeting. This eliminates a surprising number.
Default to 25 or 50 minutes instead of 30 or 60. Google did this company wide and measurably reduced meeting fatigue.
Kill a meeting every quarter. Cancel one recurring meeting. See if anyone notices. More often than not, they won't.
The bigger picture
Meeting culture is a symptom. The cause is a work culture that confuses activity with productivity, presence with contribution, and talking about work with doing work.
When evaluating companies on Laddro, ask about meeting culture in interviews. "How many hours per week does someone in this role spend in meetings?" is a perfectly reasonable question that tells you more about the company than any values statement.
Your time is your most valuable professional asset. Guard it like one.